US troops would have prodded buttock apparently

Sometimes you have to wonder about the Americans, some of them take things a bit too far.

This Independent article has some brilliant quotes from military officials from the US and UK about the difference in rules of engagement between the two countries. The example that is used is the recent capture of UK Naval personnel by Iranian troops.

It makes for a fascinating concise insight into the differing military stances by both countries although I would suggest that the British way is more diplomatic.

The American view:

"The unique US Navy rules of engagement say we not only have a right to self-defence but also an obligation to self-defence. They [the British] had every right in my mind and every justification to defend themselves rather than allow themselves to be taken. Our reaction was, 'Why didn't your guys defend themselves?'"

- Lt-Cdr Erik Horner , Executive Officer USS Underwood
(Same task group as HMS Cornwall)

The British view

Referring to the British rules of engagement "...very much de-escalatory, because we don't want wars starting ... Rather than roaring into action and sinking everything in sight we try to step back..."

-Admiral Sir Alan West, Former First Sea Lord